[LUAU] short RHAT?

[Peter Besenbruch]

Peter Besenbruch wrote:
>> On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 02:05 -1000, Jim Thompson wrote:
>>> Question:  You're a Fortune 1000 company... you want to deploy some  
>>> linux, but you require rock-solid support from a company
>>> with real assets and a real reputation.   Your choices are:
>>>
>>> Red Hat, Canonical (Ubuntu), Sun (Ubuntu), Novel or Oracle.
>>>
>>> Who do you choose?
> 
> Julian Yap wrote:
> 
>> I wouldn't say that Oracle has proven anything with their Linux support.
> 
> I might take that a step further. I have yet to see a company manage 
> security updates more slowly, or more sloppily than Oracle. If that in 
> any way predicts what their Linux support will be like, then they should 
> be chosen for mission critical systems.

There should be a "not" in there, as in "...they should NOT be chosen..."

-- 
Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org
HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky