[LUAU] short RHAT?

[Peter Besenbruch]

> On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 02:05 -1000, Jim Thompson wrote:
>> Question:  You're a Fortune 1000 company... you want to deploy some  
>> linux, but you require rock-solid support from a company
>> with real assets and a real reputation.   Your choices are:
>>
>> Red Hat, Canonical (Ubuntu), Sun (Ubuntu), Novel or Oracle.
>>
>> Who do you choose?

Julian Yap wrote:

> I wouldn't say that Oracle has proven anything with their Linux support.

I might take that a step further. I have yet to see a company manage 
security updates more slowly, or more sloppily than Oracle. If that in 
any way predicts what their Linux support will be like, then they should 
be chosen for mission critical systems.
-- 
Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org
HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky