[luau] Re: Configuring Router
Dustin Cross
dusty at sandust.com
Wed Jul 24 22:31:00 PDT 2002
Aloha,
I just set-up a business account with RR and we are getting ~3.7Mb down
~1Mb up. The installer said the system was capped at 4Mb. That costs $199
per month and comes with 5 static IPs and we can have servers.
An OC-12 is 622Mb per sec. An OC-3 is 155Mb/sec. When I was at Level3
Communications they were testing OC-192s working with Cisco to get OC-768.
An OC-1 would be 53Mb, but we start at OC-3. The bandwidth is out there.
I have heard rumors about RR and other cable companies shutting down users,
but have not experienced it myself. I did have some friends in San Diego
kicked off @home for running servers. And other friends who lost incomming
port 80 from @home when NIMDA was big. I don't want to gamble with having
my mail server down so I use DSL and a provider who doesn't care. I do
miss the speed I gave up in the switch though.
Dusty
> I dunno what you guys are capped at out there, but I hear it's even
> higher than what I'm at here.
>
> Here I get 2.5/.5 for $45/m. That amount of bandwidth probably costs
> them (even at the rate they buy it) about $1000/m. They gamble that
> you won't use it all most of the time. When you run a server, you
> mess that up. If you want to run a server, they offer "commercial
> contracts" where you can do whatever you want as long as it's not
> illegal (same thing you get with like a T1). These contracts cost a
> LOT more (usually around $200-$700/m), but still less than buying a
> "real line" from the phone company. The reason they cost more is that
> you're using more.
>
> Unfortunately, the equipment to run at these insanely high speeds is
> expensive. An OC-12 for example runs 155Mbit full-duplex over a single
> pair of fiber at insane distances. That laser has to switch
> 155,000,000 times per second. Any volunteers to build it cheap? The
> telcos inflate their prices a LOT, which is why they're so rich...if
> you guys have competitive phone service your prices are probably lower
> than my
> examples as that's what it is in Indiana where we have a baby bell, but
> they still have to make money, pay their workers, and buy equipment.
> Hawaii is also a little more bandwidth rich than Indiana (it's a hub
> between west coast, Japan, and .au), but it's still expensive.
>
> RR isn't being mean; they're being realistic. Normal residental use is
> VERY bursty. Small business usage is less, but still so. They count
> on this to give you the kind of connection you get at decent prices.
> Try to get your connection from the phone company; it won't be cheap.
> If RR let you do whatever you wanted on their $50/m residential
> contracts, they'd be out of business in less than an hour probably.
>
> Also, remember that cable modems are a shared bandwidth medium. Think
> of them as a huge coax ethernet segment. In fact, they even run a LLC
> protcol similar to ethernet! When one person uses a disproportionate
> amount of bandwidht, it slows the others down. This can cause
> nightmares for the cable co as they have to go splitting subnets.
>
> Here's an idea though, and this might actually be possible since you
> guys are on small islands and seem to be fairly well organized. Use
> various devices to set up a big public access network. Start off with
> T1s and upgrade as you go. Eventually you'll become so big, that the
> telco might be willing to PEER with you. This ain't buying bandwidht
> folks, this means you ARE another telco (expect them to fight it at
> first though; telcos HATE competition). Telephone companies have no
> choice but to peer with others, otherwise they're of no use. Ideas for
> links:
>
> *RONJA: http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~clock/twibright/ronja/
> *Directional Microwave, 802.11b/g, or possibly 802.11a
> *If two people live next to each other or close enough where buying a
> right of way is feasable, go all out and run fiber!
>
> Unfortunately the startup costs are EXTREMELY high (and you need some
> dedicated individuals to maintain it), but it's amazing what you can do
> when you have a community owned network. You can run native IPv6 on
> it and offer VoIP services. Every telephone can have it's own phone
> number, or be tied to a central one for the house. Built in voicemail,
> caller ID, etc. The possibilities are endless.
>
> Extreme idea. You bet, I probably wouldn't even bother trying. But
> that gives you a good idea of what roadrunner and others are trying to
> do. It's not easy to provide high speed internet at reasonable prices.
>
> --MonMotha
>
> _______________________________________________
> LUAU mailing list
> LUAU at videl.ics.hawaii.edu
> http://videl.ics.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/luau
More information about the LUAU
mailing list