[LUAU] interesting article on Mark Spencer/Digium

[Jim Thompson]

On Jun 10, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Tom Gordon wrote:

> Why would MacOS not be considered proprietary? Who knows, maybe Jim  
> is reffering to OSX, or something.  I do know there are still bits  
> I can't get at.  But I'll admit, I gave up quickly.

The Apple-approved name is not "OSX", but rather "MacOS X".    Its  
MacOS version 10.

Jim doesn't even bother to load "Classic" (OS9) on his machines, and  
hadn't owned a Mac since 1985 prior to "MacOS X" shipping.

Jim