[LUAU] SAMBA or NFS?

Doug Stanfield DOUGS at oceanic.com
Sun Jan 17 16:59:27 PST 1999


Samba is probably best when ever Windows is part of the mix.  In order to do
NFS you'd need NFS software to run on the win95 boxes.  Its difficult enough
to get windows native software to run on w95.  A key consideration is that
you keep security issues in mind, in this circumstance at least using
tcp-wrappers on your masqeruading box.

-Doug-

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny [mailto:peps at Athena.Xceptions.COM]
> Sent: Sunday, January 17, 1999 2:33 PM
> To: luau at luau.hi.net
> Subject: [LUAU] SAMBA or NFS?
> 
> 
> whats the best solution in mounting fat32 hosts to a linux 
> server? Here's
> the scenario. Linux is the server and 2 win95 are hosts on 
> ip-masq. I need
> to give ftp access to those win boxes from the outside w/out 
> having to ftp
> the files from the gateway machine. which is the best way of 
> making this
> seemless as possible? SAMBA or NFS?
>  
> -danny
> 



More information about the LUAU mailing list