<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.3315.2870" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>A few excellent follow up links on this
topic.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>"WASHINGTON--Lawmakers, trustbusters and
competitors are turning up the heat on Microsoft, indicating they could seek to
delay the company's Windows XP operating system, due to ship in October.
"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Including an excellent streaming video of the
Senator's speech. This is an excellent video explaining Microsoft's plans
to unfairly leverage their desktop operating system monopoly with Windows XP to
destroy competition and take over more markets. WATCH THIS
VIDEO.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><A href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6658768.html#"><FONT
face=Arial
size=2>http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6658768.html#</FONT></A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>"When the lawsuit was originally brought up,
Microsoft was allowed to ship Windows 98 with Internet Explorer an "integral
part" of the OS. Of course, now that Netscape is no longer a threat, they're
willing to say that PC manufacturers can now "disable" IE, as </FONT><A
href="http://cnnfn.cnn.com/2001/07/11/technology/windows/"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>CNN reported earlier</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial size=2>. Microsoft
is doing it again, but with Messenger, Windows Media Player, Photo printing
services, and other technologies in XP. It's important for the government to act
before Microsoft subsumes other technologies into Windows in the quest for
"innovation". </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><A
href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=01/07/25/0122212&cid=87"><FONT
face=Arial
size=2>http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=01/07/25/0122212&cid=87</FONT></A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>"Microsoft is guilty. Why should they be allowed to
morph thier guilty product during an appeal? <BR>It's like the justic department
is saying'I know your are guilty of making a product to enhance your monopoly
but it's okay to keep selling it and improving your monopoly position while we
decice how punish you." HELLO! "Yes, are a mass murderer and are guilty. You may
still practice and improving your murdering skills while we decide what to do
with you." Am I off base here?"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><A
href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=01/07/25/0122212&cid=22">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=01/07/25/0122212&cid=22</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>