I would have to agree! With exception of Visio and Games there is no reason to run windoze. I spend my entire day on *nix of some sort. I have had a couple problems with word docs in star office, just because my job requires me to write insanely complex word docs, but I still use star office and some other windoz user fix the odd formating. Dusty > I have a windoze desktop next to my Linux portable, but it is > mainly relegated to burning CD-Rs and running windoze apps. I do > virtually everything in Linux, so I of course use Linux apps like > Quanta, which of course is free. I use SSH as well, from Linux, and > Mozilla for my browser/email instead of from Outlook (no visual basic > viruses for me). I am largely disappointed by the large number of linux > enthusiasts who continue to use windoze when a preferable linux > alternative exists. For example, rather than using windoze to move > things around windoze networks, I use the various smb utilities, and a > wonderful app called linneighborhood that effortlessly finds and browses > any windoze domain/workgroup. I long ago gave up photoshop for Gimp > (still haven't gotten the new 1.2 though), Word/WordPro have been > replace by Star Office, and the same goes for Excel and Lotus. The only > holdouts: I can't view quicktime files, and I can't proof my HTML in > Internet Exploder under Linux. I've also been too lazy to set up > printing to all of our printers on my linux laptop. For everything > else, there's simply NO reason to even boot up in Windoze. > > -Jeff > > > Warren Togami wrote: > > > I'd hate to admit it, but yes I too use Frontpage 2000. (But don't bash me > > too hard. I use vi 75% of the time for other things.) > > I have to admit that Frontpage is damn good for the job and I already have > > it... came with my computer. Quick and easy GUI editing for expediance, and > > a HTML mode when I need it (very often). Anyone know of a free alternative > > to Frontpage that works just as well? > > > > And I would have to disagree that Frontpage mangles your code. That may > > have been true with Frontpage 97 and Frontpage Express, but 2000 seems to be > > good in leaving your existing format intact. Yeah, it isn't perfect, but it > > isn't very bad like earlier versions. I find those