No subject

"So UnitedLinux will remain an open-source project?
Absolutely. The only difference is that the UnitedLinux binaries will not
freely distributed. People will be able to download the source code and
compile their own binaries, but they will not be able to use the
UnitedLinux brand."

Or is this saying you can compile and redistribute UnitedLinux, but you
can't call it UnitedLinux?

I have read all through their site and found nothing about not using
GPL/LGPL.

This sounds like a really good idea.

Dusty




> Hmmm.... United Linux doesn't look like it will unite many geeks
> through its  appeal - no desktop support?  No downloadable binaries?
> I'll stick with  Mandrake or Red Hat, thank you.  Read the suit-speak
> at
> http://www.linuxandmain.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=81
>
> -Jeff
>
>
>
> On Thursday 30 May 2002 04:07 am, you wrote:
>> Press Release
>> May 30, 2002
>> Caldera, Conectiva, SuSE, Turbolinux Partner To Create UnitedLinux,
>> And Produce A Uniform Version Of Linux For Business
>>
>> Majority of enterprise system and software vendors including AMD,
>> Borland, Computer Associates, Fujitsu Siemens, Fujitsu Japan,
>> Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel, NEC, Progress Software, and SAP, support
>> effort to create standard Linux platform  ...
>>
>> http://www.unitedlinux.com
>>
>>
>> ----------
>> Gary
>>
>>   4:07am  up 54 days, 17:33,  1 user,  load average: 0.02, 0.08, 0.05
>
> _______________________________________________
> LUAU mailing list
> LUAU at videl.ics.hawaii.edu
> http://videl.ics.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/luau