"reccomended" version of RedHat?

[Marcus Patino]

I have trying to play with RH7 and it is rather annoying how they are 
changing a few file names here and moving other filesthere - other than that 
it hasn't been too bad (Just wish they would leave well enough alone)


>From: "Erich S." <sharky at websharx.com>
>Reply-To: "Linux & Unix Advocates & Users" <luau at list.luau.hi.net>
>To: "Linux & Unix Advocates & Users" <luau at list.luau.hi.net>
>Subject: [luau] "reccomended" version of RedHat?
>Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 22:43:52 -1000 (HST)
>
>
>Aloha Folks! :)
>
>I'm planning on putting up a linux server in as a mutual file storage area
>for a mixed PC/Mac environment. Aside from file storage, it'd be used as a
>staging and test area for web developement (Apache, PHP, mySQL).
>
>For lack of serious experience with any of the other distro's and wanting
>to work with something that I'm familiar with I'm looking at using RedHat.
>
>I've heard a few negative comments regarding the recent RedHat 7, and am
>not so interested in the latest and greatest, but a good stable version
>that can be patched with latest security fixes and run with a minimum of
>fuss. I've got an old RedHat 6.0 on CD, but am concerned that it may be a
>bit too old.
>
>Should I take the plunge with 7, patch up my ole 6.0, or get something
>in-between? Also, anyone else out there using a Linux server in a mixed
>PC/Mac enviroment for shared file storage?
>
>Thanks in advance!
>	Erich
>
>
>---
>You are currently subscribed to luau as: manou69 at hotmail.com
>To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com